[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal of new control field: Date



>> > That way one could tell, even when offline, if a package hasn't been
>> > updated in ten years.
>> I hope we don't have any of those.
> And those that we have, we can also spot them by old Standards-Version
> in lintian warnings.

> If anyone can suggest me a decent heuristics to spot a 'rotting' package
> (like, for example standards-version older than X, but you need to tell
> me what X), I can automatically mine it and turn it into a debtags tag.

There is no such heuristic. Just because a package last upload is long
ago doesn't mean the package is outdated/broken/whatever. It may mean
that, but it may also just mean that there was no reason to update it.

-- 
bye, Joerg
"If you are using an Macintosh e-mail program that is not from Microsoft, we
recommend checking with that particular company. But most likely other e-mail
 programs like Eudora are not designed to enable virus replication" 
   -- http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/office/2001/virus_alert.asp


Reply to: