Re: Bug#560216: Missing symbol HEIMDAL_KRB5_1.0
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:24:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Richard A Nelson <email@example.com> writes:
> > Good luck with this. When I installed heimdal, it was the only choice
> > that allowed me to utilize the existing LDAP db - which has alot of
> > benefits... I may reconsider, if MIT's LDAP support is reasonable....
> > There just doesn't seem to be a good way to keep the MIT and HEIMDAL
> > versions of some important packages in sync :(
> With the existence of heimdal-multidev, we're getting closer. In fact,
> that may be enough, although having libkrb5-multidev as well would be
> good. I need to talk about the libpam-heimdal maintainer about the
> libpam-krb5 package taking it over and building both using the multidev
That would be great so #551455 would get fixed all by itself.