Re: Bug#560216: Missing symbol HEIMDAL_KRB5_1.0
Richard A Nelson <cowboy@debian.org> writes:
> Good luck with this. When I installed heimdal, it was the only choice
> that allowed me to utilize the existing LDAP db - which has alot of
> benefits... I may reconsider, if MIT's LDAP support is reasonable....
> There just doesn't seem to be a good way to keep the MIT and HEIMDAL
> versions of some important packages in sync :(
With the existence of heimdal-multidev, we're getting closer. In fact,
that may be enough, although having libkrb5-multidev as well would be
good. I need to talk about the libpam-heimdal maintainer about the
libpam-krb5 package taking it over and building both using the multidev
environment.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: