[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should ucf be of priority required?

On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 01:17:30PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 12:39:28PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > There's no reason that ucf *should* fall under either of these rules; so
> > even if ucf /didn't/ work the way it does, the right solution here would be
> > to fix it so that it did, not to add it to Essential.

> Makes sense. But how do you fix a package to do what its supposed to do,
> when it isn't installed anymore?

You don't; but I don't see any evidence that ucf's behavior isn't already

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: