Charles Plessy wrote: > Maybe it is because you never wanted to listen to people who were > interested to have the debian directory in a tar.gz, without a patch > system on top of it? > > I answered to your feedback request, realised that you were not going to change > your mind about format ‘3.0 (quilt)’, and then gave up. How many others? I didn't work much on 3.0 (git) beyond submission, because I was getting a definite vibe that Raphael was interested in his quilt format and only that format. Perhaps Raphael in turn was sensing that I didn't have a deep knowledge of git -- I had only used it for a month or so at the time. And in fact, we now know a much better way to do a git based format. I have been considering working on it again, after #554682 is fixed. > I understand that you do not want to throw away your work on this patch > management system, but by making it optional, I think that you will actually > increase your chances of success… I think that's very wise. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature