Le samedi 14 novembre 2009 à 16:40 +0100, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > > * Does upstart make things like dynamic allocation of VTs > > possible? > > * Otherwise, shouldn’t we replace the getty processes started by > > init by a small daemon that can allocate them as we see fit? > > In all cases, as long as some consoles are managed by /etc/inittab we > > are kind of doomed. > > I guess you mean as long as there is no negociation between gdm and > whatever decides where gettys go? GDM does try to use a VT that is not currently in use - although there can be race conditions. The process which doesn’t negociate is init: consoles defined in /etc/inittab are started without any thought, regardless of whether they are available or not. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=