Re: GR proposal: the AGPL does not meet the DFSG (take 2)
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 01:07:24PM -0800, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:41:31PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > -- The code is modified to interact with the user using a network protocol
> > > that does not allow to display a prominent offer.
> >
> > Any example of this?
>
> One could add an IMAP interface to a blog management system, allowing
> one to post from an email client.
RFC 3501, 7.1. Server Responses - Status Responses
ALERT
The human-readable text contains a special alert that MUST be
presented to the user in a fashion that calls the
user's attention to the message.
That's how warnings like "your mailbox is near quota" work today.
Gabor
--
---------------------------------------------------------
MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
---------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: