This one time, at band camp, Tom Feiner said: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <ssm@debian.org> > wrote: > > Tom Feiner <feiner.tom@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> Is /var/cache really such a bad option? I mean, the entire web content > >> is re-generated from templates & graphs are re-generated from the rrd > >> databases every 5 minutes. So even if someone did delete the > >> directory, it'll just be recreated up to 5 minutes later. > > > > Apart from "it feels wrong", no. > > Hm... it does feel a bit wrong, but do we have any other sensible > choice? Adding /var/lib/munin-www/ is also an option, but it feels just > as bad as /var/cache :) /var/lib is much worse than /var/cache for this. I don't really see an objection to /var/cache, even aesthetically. It's not like the admin can't change it later if they don't like it. Cheers, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature