Re: btrfs

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: btrfs
From: Luca Niccoli <lultimouomo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:56:27 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 4e9568870910140856i3c7a947ex499f49e49e641055@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <4e9568870910140618k6c20f15p6774fcd46e8bcc4b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 200910071412.47539.russell@coker.com.au> <[🔎] 1254899750.10950.48.camel@shizuru> <[🔎] 147e40f30910070052p10fd310o29c2b768c1c5b921@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 200910080001.15482.russell@coker.com.au> <[🔎] 20091007142433.GF1689@yuggoth.org> <4e9568870910140618k6c20f15p6774fcd46e8bcc4b@mail.gmail.com>

2009/10/7 The Fungi <fungi@yuggoth.org>:

> Now if only it had CONFIG_DRM_I915_KMS

Pass modeset=1 as a parameter to the module.

Cheers,

Luca

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: btrfs
  - From: The Fungi <fungi@yuggoth.org>

References:
- btrfs
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: btrfs
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: btrfs
  - From: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
- Re: btrfs
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: btrfs
  - From: The Fungi <fungi@yuggoth.org>

Prev by Date: Re: OpenVZ - deb-packages
Next by Date: Re: btrfs
Previous by thread: Re: kms (was: btrfs)
Next by thread: Re: btrfs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread