hey, On 01/09/2009 Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 01:45:23PM +0200, Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> wrote: > > On Sep 01, Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > Wouldn't make it sense then if udev had a recommends or at least suggests for > > > usbutils and pciutils? > > Yes, the next upload (today in experimental maybe) will do this. > > > > > How will usb-id and pci-id behave, if the ids files are not accessible? > > Print an error on stderr and exit with rc=1. > > The more interesting question is which packages care about this > > information and how they will behave when it is missing. > > An interesting corollary is how will upgraded systems behave ? A lot of > the currently installed ones have a separate /usr. It would be a shame to > tell users they have to reinstall (or go through hoops to put /usr in /) do we really consider to stop support for seperate /usr? after all fhs supports seperate /usr by design. [1] i hope that we keep fhs compability within debian. greetings, jonas [1] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#THEROOTFILESYSTEM
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature