Re: Launching and l10n NMU campaign for the squeeze release cycle
On 22/08/09 at 11:59 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Of course, at any time of the process, things may be negotiated with
> > the maintainer, and adapted to his|her work process...including fully
> > abandoning the NMU intent..:-)
> > This time, I'll look closer at packages I intend to NMU. Probably
> > those that are at the top of the list might be poorly maintained
> > packages, or even abandoned ones. For the last NMU campaigns, I took
> > care of even those packages, but, this time, I might consider asking
> > for the package removal if it appears too buggy, useless, outdated, or
> > whatever else.
> Not a bad idea. Please do share the ones were you did not get any
> maintainer response with the MIA Team even if you proceed with the NMU
> so they can look into the specific reasons why the maintainer seems to
> be inactive.
Also, if you run into suspicious packages, that might be candidate for
orphaning and removal, and don't have time to investigate them yourself,
please make a list and send it to email@example.com.
| Lucas Nussbaum
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: email@example.com GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |