Re: Automatic Debug Packages
Peter Samuelson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> [Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]
>> We haven't agreed on whether there should be one ddeb per source or
>> per binary package, so I would leave this still opened.
> Maybe I'm losing track of things here, but it seems to me that everyone
> except you is saying one ddeb per binary. And then you say "sure, we
> could do that if we need to". How many times has this happened so far
> in the thread? I haven't been keeping count.
Joerg was also advocating one ddeb per source package in the summary
message that he sent about the ftp-master approach, and Emilio has
mentioned a few times that ftp-master needs to buy in on that decision
(which I agree with). I'm not sure if I'm missing some concern from the
Russ Allbery (email@example.com) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>