Re: question about iptables and bug #538608
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:27:20AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > the "renamed debian/patches to debian/patch to avoid
> > 3.0-quilt-by-default bug reports"
> > changelog in latest iptables makes me uncomfortable...
> > is it something we should all do eventually ?
>
> Definitely no.
>
> Some maintainers with complex build system might want to handle patches
> separately and not let dpkg-source handle it, in that case it can make
> sense.
>
> But in most cases, one should simply adapt the build system to be
> compatible with the new source format 3.0 (quilt). It usually doesn't
> involve many changes.
>
> In the case of iptables, I really don't think it was warranted to work
> around in that way but since it's up to the maintainer...
>
> Cheers,
At least in one case, I change the series file on-fly at building time
to create different flavors of the same lib with a different patchset.
I roughly suspect this is not compatible with the 3.0 format, but it
is also difficult to be auto-detected...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: