On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:10:11PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > Hello > > In the Cc'ed bug report we were asked to created a libmysqld-pic package that > only contains libmysqld_pic.a which should be compiled with -fPIC. > As I'm no library expert I gladly follow the recommendation of Policy §10.2 > and ask for comments :) The reason for creating this package was that > libmysqld.a (the embeddable MySQL server) should be included in other shared > libraries, like one from Modestas' Amarok package. If other libraries are including this library, then why is libmysqld not being provided as a properly-versioned shared object? I am not convinced that compiling with -fPIC is appropriate here--it's working around the fact that mysql isn't providing a properly reusable shared library. Linking an -fPIC static library (a) with a shared library (b) will make the contents of (a) part of the exported interface of (b) because it will by default be added to the dynamic symbol table unless you take special action with linker scripts. There are obvious issues with security updates if people are linking against libmysqld.a, since all libraries linking against it will need rebuilding if there's a security update. If it's shared, that won't normally be required. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
Description: Digital signature