[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The wider implications of stuffing the NEW queue with issues it was not designed for.

On Sun, Jul 19 2009, Ben Finney wrote:

> There are a great many Debian changelog messages along the lines of
> “made change foo to keep Lintian happy” as though that were the only
> readon why such a change would be beneficial. Apart from being bloody
> useless, that kind of changelog message strongly implies that the writer
> hasn't bothered to understand why Lintian was programmed to complain
> about the issue in the first place.

        Or the writer thinks that the Lintian check is wrong or
 pointless, and does not have the energy to enter into a flame fest
 about the issue. I have a few pet peeves with Lintian myself.

"A car is just a big purse on wheels." Johanna Reynolds
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: