Re: The wider implications of stuffing the NEW queue with issues it was not designed for.

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The wider implications of stuffing the NEW queue with issues it was not designed for.
From: Julien BLACHE <jblache@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 09:55:30 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87fxcufmrx.fsf@sonic.technologeek.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20090718000957.GE5080@kunpuu.plessy.org> (Charles Plessy's message of "Sat, 18 Jul 2009 09:09:57 +0900")
References: <[🔎] 4A604816.5030506@debian.org> <[🔎] 20090718000957.GE5080@kunpuu.plessy.org>

Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> wrote:

Hi,

> Automatic rejection of packages with errors not justified by overrides is of

And what do you do with unjustified overrides?

Or can I just override every lintian test and upload my totally broken
package?

JB.

-- 
 Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jblache@debian.org> 
 
 Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 
 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The wider implications of stuffing the NEW queue with issues it was not designed for.
  - From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
- Re: The wider implications of stuffing the NEW queue with issues it was not designed for.
  - From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>

References:
- Re: The wider implications of debhelper/dbus breakage
  - From: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>
- Re: The wider implications of stuffing the NEW queue with issues it was not designed for.
  - From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: The wider implications of debhelper/dbus breakage
Next by Date: Bug#537423: ITP: mysqmail -- Use MySQL accouting and auth for most used MTA
Previous by thread: Re: The wider implications of stuffing the NEW queue with issues it was not designed for.
Next by thread: Re: The wider implications of stuffing the NEW queue with issues it was not designed for.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread