Re: Lintian magic-arch-in-arch-list
Philipp Kern <trash@philkern.de> writes:
> On 2009-06-22, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote:
>> Philipp Kern <trash@philkern.de> writes:
>>> As explained lintian was wrong after I dropped the bit that
>>> collapsed "amd64 i386 all" to "any" in dpkg-source. The problem is
>>> that we lost information about what needs to be built where. "any"
>>> if there is one i386 and one all binary package is just plain wrong,
>>> IMHO.
>> Both Lintian and Policy, in fact. Policy will be fixed in the next
>> release.
> I was pretty sure to have it looked up before submitting the patch,
> but rereading it carefully I can see "can include the following sets
> of values". So this means that each set is to be considered
> independent. Bummer.
Not a problem. The whole section was rather confusingly worded, so it
was a good opportunity for a rewrite.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: