Re: Lintian magic-arch-in-arch-list
On 2009-06-22, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote:
> Philipp Kern <trash@philkern.de> writes:
>> As explained lintian was wrong after I dropped the bit that collapsed
>> "amd64 i386 all" to "any" in dpkg-source. The problem is that we lost
>> information about what needs to be built where. "any" if there is one
>> i386 and one all binary package is just plain wrong, IMHO.
> Both Lintian and Policy, in fact. Policy will be fixed in the next
> release.
I was pretty sure to have it looked up before submitting the patch, but
rereading it carefully I can see "can include the following sets of values".
So this means that each set is to be considered independent. Bummer.
Sorry,
Philipp Kern
Reply to: