On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:40:01 +0200 Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> wrote: > > For the avoidance of confusion I would suggest that this be changed to > > Reviewed-by - the normal Linux/git Signed-off-by has a specific meaning > > that needn't include actually doing a code review. > > I started first with "Reviewed-by" and then thought that it was stupid to > not reuse the name that is already vastly used for a similar purpose. What > do other people think? I'm fine with both names. Vastly used in the git world, not as vastly used outside of it. Reviewed-by conveys the same information and is more easily understandable IMHO. -- Andrea Bolognani <eof@kiyuko.org> Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected.
Attachment:
pgpb_sMvGHkF4.pgp
Description: PGP signature