Re: DEP-5: Please clarify the meaning of "same licence and share copyright holders"
Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> writes:
> Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> writes:
>
> > I'm finding it difficult to believe the argument "oh, but this isn't
> > going to be mandatory".
>
> I don't know anyone making the argument that there should *never* be a
> mandatory machine-parseable ‘debian/copyright’ format.
Sorry, this is too broad; it should be: I don't know anyone promoting a
machine-parseable ‘debian/copyright’ format who makes the argument that
no such format should ever be mandatory.
--
\ “Why should I care about posterity? What's posterity ever done |
`\ for me?” —Groucho Marx |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
Reply to: