On Thu May 07 00:38, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > What about the (many) arguments made here about the *other* reasons to > > have /usr a separate filesystem? > > I've nothing against them, I was countering only this precise > argument. FWIW, I haven't seen that many, though the one about > read-only /usr was appropriate. More to the point, has anyone actually presented any real arguments why _not_ to allow it? I've not actually seen anything other than the OP saying "things might need changing to support it" and then refusing to go into detail. Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature