Hi, On Dienstag, 5. Mai 2009, Marco d'Itri wrote: > I have been told by upstream maintainers of one of my packages and by > prominent developers of other distributions that supporting a standalone > /usr is too much work and no other distribution worth mentioning does it > (not Ubuntu, not Fedora, not SuSE). besides that appearantly Ubuntu keeps supporting /usr, it's pointless to discuss this here. LSB which maintains FHS is the right place for this. On Dienstag, 5. Mai 2009, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > Could you elaborate on the kind of "large changes" there are in Debian > > to support this? > I'd rather not change subject. And this is just hillarious. If you can't explain why, why bother? regards, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.