Le mercredi 15 avril 2009 à 11:44 -0500, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
> > Policy documents practice. When that new /bin/sh exists, you can change
>
> bash is the current /bin/sh, from your statements I could imply that we
> should require all /bin/sh's to support: b0rken bash arrrays, shell
> regexes!, ${RANDOM,HOSTNAME,{E,}UID}, pushd, popd, let, exec -c/-l/-a, ...?
> lots of those features are used in the wild, thus "practice."
> And taking your statement to the extreme, it means that if zsh was used
> as /bin/sh then no other shell interpreter could ever be used as /bin/sh
> ever again but a fork of zsh.
I’m proposing to do the exact opposite. But I see you are only
interested in trolling, not in discussing options.
--
.''`. Debian 5.0 "Lenny" has been released!
: :' :
`. `' Last night, Darth Vader came down from planet Vulcan and told
`- me that if you don't install Lenny, he'd melt your brain.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=