Re: muscle: package name conflicts with existing M.U.S.C.L.E. project
once we are at renaming issues: IMHO we should simply close this bug report.
I fail to se a real problem here. There is only one binary /usr/bin/muscle
so there is no conflict regarding policy and the fact that package names
are quite similar is not really nice but they are definitely distinguishable
via short description and so I would like to close this bug.
Did I miss anything?