[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#522996: ITP: jruby1.2 -- 100% pure-Java implementation of Ruby



On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:08:17PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Why do we need jruby1.0, jruby1.1 and now jruby1.2 ?
> 
> so multiple versions of jruby can be simultaneously installed on a
> system, like with python2.x, ruby1.x, etc ?

While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
important for jruby...

Mike


Reply to: