Re: Bug#522996: ITP: jruby1.2 -- 100% pure-Java implementation of Ruby

[Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>]

+ Sebastien Delafond (Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:08:17 -0700):

> On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Why do we need jruby1.0, jruby1.1 and now jruby1.2 ?

> so multiple versions of jruby can be simultaneously installed on a
> system, like with python2.x, ruby1.x, etc ?

The question was, rather: why would a user want to install jruby1.0 or
jruby1.1 instead of jruby1.2? What purpose does it serve having three
different versions in the archive instead of one, or two at most?

Thanks,

-- 
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
        -- Rory and Lorelai