Quoting Obey Arthur Liu (firstname.lastname@example.org): > > synaptic or shaman (from Chakra). I think that aptitude-gtk and adept > > are not userfriendly. Using these applications was quite difficult for > Heartfelt thank yous! (I'm the guy responsible for aptitude-gtk.. :D ) Is this silly to think that, as most of the (good) work was made in aptitude-gtk, an aptitude-qt development would be a better idea? Aptitude has all the nice underlying package management stuff and that would avoid reinventing the wheel.
Description: Digital signature