Re: [dissenting]: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions
Romain Beauxis <email@example.com> writes:
> Le Wednesday 25 March 2009 16:45:59 Russ Allbery, vous avez écrit :
>> FWIW, it is not at all clear to me that there was any need for either
>> of those GRs (particularly 2008_002, which did indeed strike me as a
>> waste of the GR process).
> Well, even if I would agree with you, apparently this GR had 21
> supporters.. Far from the idea of some abuse from a small number of
> So clearly, this proposition would not even "solve" this "issue".
Sure. Thus proving that this proposal isn't raising the seconding
requirement too high. :)
>> Note that the effective conclusion of both of those GRs was to do what
>> was happening anyway and would have happened without the GRs, apart
>> from the secondary effects of making the whole thing more
> For 2008_002 in particular, there was a clear need of such a decision,
> since the previous announce had been made as if it was about to happen
> while there was apprently no consensus for it.
There was a clear need for a clarification. Why we had to vote on the
clarification after Ganneff made it clear that it wasn't his intent to
implement prior to consensus is still highly perplexing to me.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>