Re: [dissenting]: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions
Romain Beauxis <email@example.com> writes:
> Le Wednesday 25 March 2009 04:57:39 Gunnar Wolf, vous avez écrit :
>> This proposal does not come from an abuse to the GR process, but to
>> generalized frustration about the way 2008_002 and specially 2008_003
>> were handled.
> I understand the furstration about them, but I don't think that the
> number of seconders was the reasons for the abuse.
> There was clearly a need for those GR, so raisong the number of
> seconders would just have the consequence to prevent us from voting on
> important topics.
FWIW, it is not at all clear to me that there was any need for either of
those GRs (particularly 2008_002, which did indeed strike me as a waste of
the GR process).
Note that the effective conclusion of both of those GRs was to do what was
happening anyway and would have happened without the GRs, apart from the
secondary effects of making the whole thing more confrontational.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>