Re: Revising Policy 12.5 (Copyright information)
Romain Beauxis <toots@rastageeks.org> writes:
> Sorry, but there was also an argument below in my message.
>
> The point is that there are possibly a lot of corner cases, such as the
> autotools case, for which we can't really decide and list every single
> issue or produce a general rational.
>
> Since the vast majority of the packages fall into a regular copyright
> and licensing, this would also mean overload the policy with stuff that
> is only relevant in a very small number of cases in proportion.
Oh, yes, I agree. However, I think Policy should say what to do about
Autotools at least, since that's a very common case.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: