[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [luabind] Naming library with proper SONAME

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:18:59PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sánchez [Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:30:19 -0400]:
> > I am curious as to what people generally think of how the libluabind
> > SONAME will be going forward.  I know that certain packages (like
> > libssl) have the complete version in the SONAME, but I can't imagine
> > that this is a really good idea.  Is this a showstopper for having
> > libluabind in Debian, or just for a stable release?  Is this
> > discouraged, but otherwise permissible?
> It’s certainly not desirable. Do you have an estimation of how many
> reverse dependencies libluabind will have? Goswin’s remark about API
> compatibility is also an important one.
Currently, none of the luabind packages have reverse dependencies
(except for stuff like libluabind-dbg depending on libluabind0).



Roberto C. Sánchez

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: