Re: lrmi vs new kernels vs libx86
Hi!
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 16:49:33 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> dear maintainers of packages that contain lrmi.{c,h},
>
> today Lucas has reported #518725 - atitvout FTBFS because of missing
> *_MASK defines.
> Seeing that bug and remembering fun with lrmi myself, I thought I can
> have a look how many other packages will FTBFS.
> The following packages contain lrmi.{c,h}, and the ones with the *
> FTBFS:
> read-edid*
Some time ago I filed a bug with a patch to switch it to use libx86.
<http://bugs.debian.org/495131>.
> svgalib*
And I ported svgalib to libx86 long time ago, so it's not using the
embedded lrmi. It also builds locally, do you have the failing logs?
regards,
guillem
Reply to: