Re: Python related changes for unstable/squeeze
Michal Čihař wrote:
>> There are other things which may be worth a look.
> - Can you guys please finally sit down and agree on one solution for
> handling python modules? I still think that having two (slightly
> different) ways of doing this task is not the way to go. I really do
> not see technical reason for this situation. I have no preference at
> all and I'm actually using both things in my packages, but I really
> do not think it is way to go. And it would be great if we can have
> single tool, which gets more testing and will have less bugs than
> current concurrent solutions.
Ack. Please guys, get together, discuss it in a *sane* way (why do I fear that's
not possible...) and merge both tools or drop both of them and do something else
useful - together.
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprint: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79