Le mardi 17 février 2009 à 07:41 +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi a écrit : > > Currently, the discussion is clearly happening at other levels. If you > > look at the recent cgroups discussion for example, it will clearly be > > decided at the distribution level, without any kind of standardization. > > Is not this the right thing to do? > > Standards should be most frozen as possible. I don't find a lot of > think that need to be added. Currently I see at least a clear need to add /sys, and another one to allow pure 64bit hierarchies. > Also for cgroups, I really hope that proposal come from distributions > (and common usage). Only after one distribution use it, it need to > be standardized. IMHO standards should come from bottom. I’m not saying that something like cgroups should be directly written in stone to the standard. However the discussion should have taken place at a cross-distribution level so that it could be standardized later, if needed. > Anyway, I think that we must give new live to fhs mailing list > (also for discussion, not only for proposal). Do you really want to subscribe to a list that only ships 50 spams/month currently? -- .''`. Debian 5.0 "Lenny" has been released! : :' : `. `' Last night, Darth Vader came down from planet Vulcan and told `- me that if you don't install Lenny, he'd melt your brain.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=