On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 08:37 +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:00:22PM -0600, William Pitcock wrote: > > There is also questions concerning why you would want to package > > something that has effectively a dead upstream, and many code flaws > > which could result in security issues in the future. > > Uh? Since when is Unrealircd dead upstream? I wouldn't call a release > less then a month ago "dead upstream", regardless of what can be > said about unrealircd otherwise. Once 3.2.8 final is out the door, it will be stagnant. "Syzop" has a fairly large slacker attitude, and is only interested in Unreal for the money (oops, it doesn't make any for him anymore. especially not now with InspIRCd). As such, we can call Unreal dead now, barring some miracle -- but I don't see this happening with next generation ircd picking up steam like InspIRCd - which cater to that same market of IRC admin which would be interested in Unreal. William
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part