On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 09:00:46AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> However, while build dependency information is copied into the *.dsc
> file, my understanding is that it's not read from that file for
> package builds.
... while it could be, right?
(question to the buildd / sbuild gurus)
This difference of treatment between binary and source stanzas has
always puzzled me, but I'm not sure whether there is some deep
technical reason for that, or rather is just that the current buildd
implementations don't do that.
If there is no profound reason, it looks like a good candidate to be
uniformed, doesn't it?
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature