Re: RFC: DKMS - Dynamic Kernel Module Support
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:00 PM, David Paleino <d.paleino@gmail.com> wrote:
> some time ago I filed a RFS [1] for DKMS [2], and Daniel Baumann <daniel> asked
> me what advantages it had over module-assistant.
> After some talking with upstream, here I have the answer.
Only down side I worry about is that having such a solution encourages
out-of-tree drivers. Personally, I'd prefer if Debian were to adopt
some variation of Fedora's policy:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DavidWoodhouse/KmodProposal
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: