[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#199653: marked as done (SIGCHLD being ignored somewhere)

Your message dated Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:14:23 +0200
with message-id <200809031714.23714.holger@layer-acht.org>
and subject line closing this 5 year old bug about a rootkit on someones computer :-)
has caused the Debian Bug report #199653,
regarding SIGCHLD being ignored somewhere
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
199653: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199653
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Debian version: woody

Description:
I can't use apt-get update. I get the following error message:
$ apt-get update
Get:1 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages [130kB]
Get:2 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Release [110B]
Err http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages
  Waited, for gzip but it wasn't there
Fetched 130kB in 5s (23.4kB/s)
Failed to fetch http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-i386/Packages Waited, for gzip but it wasn't there 
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_stable_updates_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) 
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
This has happened to me ever since I have Debian installed (february 2003), but once, about a month ago, it did work and I was able to upgrade my system. 

This is the content of my /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-7 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-6 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-5 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-4 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-3 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-2 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 r1 _Woody_ - Official i386 Binary-1 (20021218)]/ unstable contrib main non-US/contrib non-US/main 


#deb http://security.debian.org/ woody/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
The last two lines I have tested uncommenting one or the other with the same result. 

Kernel: 2.2.20-idepci
Shared C library:  /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.2.5.so

Thanks for your wonderful work.
Regards,
Sasha



**********************************
    sasha@sextocontinente.org
    humanist@terra.es
    http://sextocontinente.org
    Humanizar la Tierra!
**********************************

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

yes, right.


regards,
	Holger

Attachment: pgpTnER9F1FyE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: