Re: ssl security desaster
Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net> writes:
> Probably the work then should be clearly labeled as fork (especially
> given the other distro maintainers also share some patches)? It will
> reduce the confusion, like "oh, erm, our <foo> is not quite upstream
> <foo>, we rewrote it from scratch, and left the name and this cute
> logo".
I try to document any such modifications in README.Debian, particularly in
cases where upstream disagrees with a patch.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: