"Kov Chai" <tchaikov@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Yes, that makes sense. At least as long as your data files are
> best approach in my mind is to create two other data packages named
> sunpinyin-le-data and sunpinyin-ge-data, and make the binary packages depend
> on the data package by its endianness accordingly.
>
> Is this solution feasible, or is there any better way to solve this problem?
compatible between 32bit and 64bit hosts.
(and make that -data-le and -data-be, IMHO)
Yes.
> And moreover, I am afraid that sunpinyin-{le,ge}-data are not architecture
> neutral. So is it okay to make these two packages Arch:all?
Use a substitution variable in debian/control and determine the
> At last, Is there any way to specify the package dependency by architecture?
correct value in debian/rules before calling dh_gencontrol.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jblache@debian.org>
Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169
GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169