Re: problems with the concept of unstable -> testing
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:52:53PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Didier Raboud schrieb:
> > ?
> Something like that, I don't really care about the name. The important
> thing is, that unstable is never frozen, but temporarily disconnected
> from the unstable > testing > stable flow.
> Another way to see it is that unstable is constantly flowing and we're
> just forking a stable distribution from it from time to time.
That sounds like ubuntu. But speaking of them, how come they are able
to do this so much more frequently than we are?