Re: qmail and related packages in NEW
* Bernd Eckenfels:
> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org> you wrote:
>> Personally, I'm more concerned about manual constant propagation in
>> some parts of the code base (like using the integer literal 4 for the
>> size of an IPv4 address), and similar coding style issues. But this
>> is certainly not restricted to qmail (Bernstein's DNS code suffers
>> from that to a higher degree, and it's in the archive).
> Well, do you think the size of ipv4 addresses ever will change? :)
Ask the poor guys who wrote IPv6 patches for djbdns.