[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: qmail and related packages in NEW

* Bernd Eckenfels:

> In article <[🔎] 873ah8x91t.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> you wrote:
>> Personally, I'm more concerned about manual constant propagation in
>> some parts of the code base (like using the integer literal 4 for the
>> size of an IPv4 address), and similar coding style issues.  But this
>> is certainly not restricted to qmail (Bernstein's DNS code suffers
>> from that to a higher degree, and it's in the archive).
> Well, do you think the size of ipv4 addresses ever will change? :)

Ask the poor guys who wrote IPv6 patches for djbdns.

Reply to: