Re: what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)
From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 14:42:32 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] ggs9fp$a7n$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] 20081128181242.32463.qmail@6879aebe33b239.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> <[🔎] 20081128205101.14b7f4e9.codehelp@debian.org> <[🔎] 1227908554.30808.44.camel@petrie> <[🔎] e13a36b30811281728h1454ad3ej2e2e97ed69c6f9eb@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20081129103642.GA24022@cordelia.baz.lan>

Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> 
> For completeness sake: QA does not thow out orphanes packages just for
> being orphaned.  If they are orphaned, RC-buggy, hardly used, and
> alternatives are available, only then they are candidates for removal.

You missed Debconf8's BoF I guess.

> 
> Bast regards,
> Bas.
> 

Cheers,
Raphael Geissert

Reply to:

References:
- qmail and related packages in NEW
  - From: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
- Re: qmail and related packages in NEW
  - From: Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org>
- what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)
  - From: William Pitcock <nenolod@sacredspiral.co.uk>
- Re: what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)
  - From: "Paul Wise" <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)
  - From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#507294: ITP: librcc -- Library for autoconvert codepages
Next by Date: no answer for 495190
Previous by thread: Re: what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)
Next by thread: Re: what about a unofficial public community repo? (was: Re: qmail and related packages in NEW)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread