Re: call for seconds: on firmware
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:42:19AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I do not think throwing options out because they are not of a
> narrow and limited scope is right. The proposer and sponsors can
> withdraw them, if they think the scope is too broad for the problem at
> hand. No one else should be removing them from consideration as a
> solution to the Lenny issue.
The proposers and sponsors of option 5 didn't propose this as an amendment
to the current GR. Why should they have to *withdraw* the proposal in order
to get it considered separately at a later time?
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/