[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DFSG violations: non-free but no contrib

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:47:56PM +0000, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> if i understand things correctly than option 2 is what we are trying to
> do with the kernel in the moment (correct me if i am wrong), and the
> only thing i am saying is that having a package A which will not work
> (in some cases) without package B should declare some kind of
> relationship on it. simply because there *is* a relation between them...

That "sort of relationship" between a package A that possibly (i.e. "in
some cases") might use a package B is AFAIK called "suggests" which
would be just fine: it declares a relationship and it is allowed to
declare it between packages in main and non-free.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: