[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 22:52 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> But regardless, Debian has promised that Debian is only free software.

Then why does Debian have non-free? Is that not part of Debian?

Does this mean that non-free should move to a third-party repo like
certain other repos out there containing controversial things?

If non-free is meant to be an opt-in part of Debian, then put the
distributable firmware there and be done with it.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: