[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

> > Wouldn't it make sense to only send [TU] bugs as these are the bugs we have to
> > fix for the release? [T] normaly means fix just waiting for migration, isn't
> > it?
> No: in some cases, the maintainer forgot to send an unblock request to
> -release@, or the fix was inappropriate, and the bug will have to be
> fixed through a testing-proposed-updates upload.

Okay, makes sense.

> The release team isn't proactively tracking those AFAIK, it's still the
> maintainer's responsibility to take care of this.


> > > Michael Meskes <meskes@debian.org>
> > > [TU]     watchdog #503080 watchdog.postinst: line 18: /sbin/MAKEDEV: No s
> > > [T]  (U) acpid #487815 acpid: dies on any given Sunday
> > > [T]  (U) acpid #491058 acpid exits
> > > [T]  (U) acpid #495686 acpid not starting after (re)boot
> > 
> > Using my bugs as an example. All four of them are fixed in unstable, so neither
> > needs work. Watchdog was reported and uploaded yesterday, so no surprise it's
> > still listed as [TU]. 
> ... and watchdog also needs an unblock.

I know. Usually I wait some days to see whether other bugs come up from the new
upload before sending out that email.

Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

Reply to: