[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 20:24 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:52:28PM +0000, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > >         This is the part I am not comfortable with. I do not think the
> > >  delegates have the powers to decide when enough progress has been made
> > >  to violate a foundation document in our release.  Just like an
> > >  individual developer does not have a right to decide to violate the
> > >  DFSG in their work, I think the release team, which prepares the
> > >  release, can do so unilaterally either (I did not vote for Bush).
> > 
> > And you're comfortable with ftp-master ruling DFSG-iness through NEW
> > then ? I don't really see the difference.
> I can't speak for Manoj, but for my own part, I have not seen any
> evidence that ftp-master is letting things through NEW which are in
> clear violation of the DFSG, so it doesn't come up.

Every kernel upload changing the ABI goes through NEW.

Your lack of knowledge of Debian processes sucks (that means: you
annoy us (at least me) with your stance and the fanatic way you defend it
in public, please stop this and come back to more constructive

Raphaël Hertzog

Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :

Reply to: