Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 20:24 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:52:28PM +0000, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > This is the part I am not comfortable with. I do not think the
> > > delegates have the powers to decide when enough progress has been made
> > > to violate a foundation document in our release. Just like an
> > > individual developer does not have a right to decide to violate the
> > > DFSG in their work, I think the release team, which prepares the
> > > release, can do so unilaterally either (I did not vote for Bush).
> > And you're comfortable with ftp-master ruling DFSG-iness through NEW
> > then ? I don't really see the difference.
> I can't speak for Manoj, but for my own part, I have not seen any
> evidence that ftp-master is letting things through NEW which are in
> clear violation of the DFSG, so it doesn't come up.
Every kernel upload changing the ABI goes through NEW.
Your lack of knowledge of Debian processes sucks (that means: you
annoy us (at least me) with your stance and the fanatic way you defend it
in public, please stop this and come back to more constructive
Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch :