Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> writes:
> A more significant distinction is, as I've pointed out several times
> already, that the Fraunhofer patents on MPEG audio algorithms *are
> known to be actively enforced* by the holder against parties who
> infringe those patents.
Please back up that claim!
All cases I know of in which patents are being enforced are not really
applicable to the debian case, because of reasons I've already written
down in the beginning of this thread.
It is really not constructive to bring this argument into the discussion
again and again without actually pointing to supporting evidence. Really.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Reinhard Tartler <siretart@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Didier Raboud <didier@raboud.com>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Reinhard Tartler <siretart@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Reinhard Tartler <siretart@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>