Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:30:50PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> So I think we need to modify the proposal, not the policy.
We need to stop pretending that patent enforcement is one of our
responsibilities or that we expose ourself to any kind of liability
by distributing code that may or may not be patent-encumbered.
Reply to:
- References:
- mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Reinhard Tartler <siretart@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Reinhard Tartler <siretart@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Didier Raboud <didier@raboud.com>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Reinhard Tartler <siretart@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Reinhard Tartler <siretart@debian.org>
- Re: mpeg encoder patents, Was: Bug#501190: ITP: moonlight
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>